"CIVILITY ,DEFINED BY UNCIVIL GOVERNMENT LEADERS"

FREEDOM OF SPEECH and THE RIGHT TO PETITION OUR GOVERNMENT FOR REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES is a right protected and guaranteed by the CONSTITUTION of theU.S.A. Casselberry mayor and commissioners decide to ignore the constitution and bypass the inalienable rights by ignoring people who bring opposition and truth to face the growing surge of wasteful spending, out of control taxation and communistic regulations and ordinances.
Civility defined by the mayor would be to"SIT DOWN,SHUT UP AND DON'T SAY A WORD",oh and agree with them. Well, this is not the way our government is suppose to be conducting business, in fact this is HOW it is NOT TO CONDUCT BUSINESS.
We are suppose to be a government "FOR,OF AND BY THE PEOPLE" and by a CONSENSUS of the people, not by the SELF WILL of our government which is CORRUPT.
When we have a disagreeing viewpoint we have the right to petition our government leaders to have them to stop foolish,illogical,stupid and unlawful decisions that detrimentally hurt and negatively affect our city by speaking at city meetings,in turn of course to voice our opinions,our private opinions ,whatever they may be.
Accountability for what is said must be at the forefront no matter the speaker?Th e Mayor or Commissioners do not have the right to stand up and DECEIVE,MISLEAD OR DELIBERATELY LIE to the public?No, they do not have a right to be UNCIVIL to the people they are to be representing and that is REPRESENTING not RULING OVER AS A MONARCHY as "BACKWATER DESPOTS".
The Mayor premeditated with the commissioners and police how they were going to stop me from public speaking to discriminate against the: "CONTENT","SPEAKER and"MATERIAL" by causing a scene by a planed "UNLAWFUL/ILLEGAL" action to arrest me, which is clearly documented by the words on the public recorded audio recording and the "ORIGINAL"arrest report on March 22,2010. How "CIVIL" is a crime against me to arrest me for "INAPPROPRIATE LANGUAGE" when the arrest report does not contain any word that I was accused of saying?WAIT A DANG MINUTE?What do you mean?Freedom of speech even covers speech that is vulgar but I did not say any vulgar words,nor anything untrue.
The Mayor made a unlawful order that overstepped her authority thus the deputy chief of police was aware I had not violated any city ordinance at the meeting so he overstepped his legal authority to detain,arrest and to have me beaten and threatened[$14,000 in medical bills to prove the abuse] consisted a of an UNLAWFUL ARREST. you SHOULD READ THE ORIGINAL ARREST REPORT it is lacking everything needed to make a lawful arrest let alone common sense.
You would conclude I not only followed civility and the rules of proper decorum buy in no way disrupted the meeting nor did or said anything I was accused of saying reported in the Original arrest report.
Now how can a person-me be prosecuted for Trespassing when trespassing was not even mentioned in the original arrest report?Falsifying police records perjuring themselves in court and the court,state attorneys office,public defender and judge cohort ed to work together to prosecute me,specially when the Judge gave unlawful jury instructions[see Katherine Macon v.State of Florida-2003 appellate decision ruling] to bias the jury.Now who is uncivilised?
Who can we trust if the government is violating the law and constitution?It is not the job of the state to prosecute innocent people,is it? Leave a comment.